Your privacy settings
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary
Analytics
Embedded Videos
Google Fonts
Marketing
The gap this closes
Organizations holding both certificates usually run two risk systems that never speak to each other — a register owned by quality, a risk management file owned by design or regulatory, different vocabulary, different scales, and the same exposure sitting in both, rated differently, with neither owner aware of the other entry.
One risk management procedure covering quality management system risk and medical device product risk — written as a finished working document, not an outline.
Combining them is not a matter of merging two spreadsheets, because the standards genuinely differ in more places than the obvious one.
ISO 9001 requires opportunities to be determined. ISO 13485 has no opportunity concept anywhere in the standard. ISO 9001 requires actions proportionate to the impact on conformity; ISO 14971 requires risk reduced as far as possible and then judged against benefit. Those are different tests and they can produce different answers about the same exposure.
Section 2.0 resolves, per product line, whether you are in general scope, device scope, or uncertain — with uncertain defaulting to device scope pending a documented determination. That last category is where most contract manufacturers, component suppliers and software providers actually sit, and it is usually resolved in about an hour once somebody asks the question.
A process risk that could reach a device should change a probability estimate in a risk management file. In two disconnected systems there is no route by which it ever does. Section 7.13 is that route, running in both directions, and it is one field on a form.
The procedure also keeps the two records apart. A notified body reviewing a risk management file will not accept it interleaved with business risk. Share the process; keep the records separate; link them with a flag.
Eleven genuine divergences, each with what ISO 9001 says, what ISO 13485 and ISO 14971 say, which position was adopted as the house standard, and what was rejected and why — followed by a sign-off table of decisions to confirm before adoption. It is the part a buyer cannot easily assemble alone, and it is what a certification body will ask about.
Written to ISO 9001:2026
ISO 9001:2026 was published on 16 September 2026, and this procedure is written to it and to ISO 13485:2016. Two editions are included: the clean edition to adopt as your procedure, and a Transition edition that marks every requirement new or materially changed since the 2015 edition with [2026] — so an organization already running a 2015-era risk process can see exactly what has to move before its transition audit.
| Standards | ISO 9001:2026 and ISO 13485:2016 |
|---|---|
| Method | ISO 14971:2019 (referenced, not reproduced) |
| Clauses | ISO 9001 Clauses 6.1 and 4.4.1; ISO 13485 Clause 7.1, with 4.1.2 b), 4.1.5, 4.1.6, 7.2 to 7.6 and 8.2.1 |
| Length | 60 pages |
| Format | Microsoft Word (.docx), fully editable |
| Delivery | Instant download |
| License | Perpetual, non-exclusive license for your organization to edit, rebrand and adopt across your own sites |
| Editions | Two Word files: the clean ISO 9001:2026 edition, and a Transition edition with every change from the 2015 edition marked [2026] |
| Also included | MSI's QuickStart for this procedure — a six-page implementation route listing the thirty-one decisions to make, in order, with the section where each is explained |
Quality and regulatory leaders at organizations holding both ISO 9001 and ISO 13485, contract manufacturers running general industrial and device lines on shared assets, and consultants supporting dual-certified clients. Particularly useful for suppliers who sit inside a customer's device quality system by contract and are not certain whether they are in device scope.
Written from what repeats. Diana Lynn has attended more than 200 certification and surveillance audits across 28 years, supporting more than 80 certifications and training more than 600 professionals. These templates encode the structural weaknesses that show up again and again, not one organization's approach generalized. Management Systems International is veteran-owned and female-owned. Questions: 760-434-9141.
Prefer to be invoiced? If your organization buys on a purchase order rather than by card, email info@msi-international.com or call 760-434-9141 and we will raise an invoice. Tell us which templates or package you need and we will send payment terms the same working day.
Every variant covers one certification combination, so you buy the one document that matches your certificates rather than assembling it from singles.
This procedure is one document in a wider system. If you are building or rebuilding the whole documentation set rather than filling a single gap, the packages below collect the procedures and guides, and work out considerably cheaper than buying them individually.
Many organizations cannot pay for training or documentation by card. Tell us what you need and we will raise an invoice.
Complete the form below and we will send an invoice, usually the same business day. Delivery is identical whether you pay by card or by invoice.
Prefer to speak to someone? Call 760-434-9141 and we will handle it directly.
Notifications