30 pages covering ISO 45001:2018 clause 5 in full — leadership and commitment, policy, roles and responsibilities, and consultation and participation of workers — together with the planning, resource, communication and management review clauses that feed it.
Clause 5.4 does not simply require consultation. It requires the organization to determine and remove obstacles and barriers to participation. Most procedures name a mechanism — a committee, a suggestion box — and stop. A mechanism nobody uses satisfies the sentence and not the clause. This procedure builds the obstacle review as a recurring determination with a record of what was found and what changed.
The clause is explicit that participation of non-managerial workers is to be emphasized, and it lists the matters on which they are to be consulted. Where a safety committee is chaired and populated by supervisors, the requirement is formally met and substantively missed. Here the participation record shows who took part and at what level.
Clause 9.3.2 d) 5) makes consultation and participation of workers a required input to management review — wording no other management system standard carries. A safety review that reports incidents and audit results but never reports whether workers were consulted, and on what, has left out an input the standard names explicitly. This procedure produces it as its own item.
Every appendix, form and worked example is part of the document. Nothing is sold separately.
Safety managers, EHS leaders and consultants at ISO 45001 certified or certifying organizations — particularly where the safety committee is the only participation mechanism and nobody has asked recently whether it works.
Not sure yet? The free Leadership and Commitment Maturity Check scores eight elements in under five minutes.
Both, deliberately. It is written as a filled-in worked example so you can see what each element looks like when done properly, with bracketed placeholders wherever a value is genuinely yours to set — frequencies, roles, thresholds, systems, retention periods. You are editing a working document rather than filling in a hollow outline.
A management review template runs the meeting. This procedure determines what arrives at the meeting: who produces each required input, on what frequency, and where the record lives before the review opens. If your reviews are hard to prepare, the problem is upstream of the agenda.
No. It covers the governance layer — context, leadership, policy, objectives, planning, resources, communication, monitoring and management review. It references neighboring processes such as risk management, competence, internal audit and corrective action rather than replacing them.
Editable Microsoft Word (.docx), with the process interaction map supplied separately as an editable SVG where the version includes one. Adapt it, rebrand it, and adopt it into your own document control system. The license permits the buying organization to use it across its own sites and issue it to employees, contractors and auditors, and permits consultants to adapt it for engagements they deliver.
A procedure does not pass an audit; an organization does. What this gives you is a procedure that addresses every requirement of the clauses it covers, with a named owner and a named record, describing a process people can actually follow. Conformity is demonstrated by implementation and evidence. Unfilled placeholders are unmet requirements, so fill them.
Every cross-reference sits in a table at the back rather than baked into the body text, precisely so you can renumber without unpicking the procedure.
Take the version matching your certification. If you run two or three standards under one system, the combined versions are built for that. If you are unsure where your current process sits, the free Leadership and Commitment Maturity Check will tell you before you spend anything.
Yes. Call MSI at 760-434-9141 to schedule a planning session.
